Following discussions with parties and the Partido Popular seems to be experiencing this strange sentence matches with former presidents of the young government seem to have to endure. Jose Maria Aznar came out yesterday talking about ideas and making the ball to Esperanza Aguirre at the most inopportune time. The country goes into a terrible economic crisis, and people of the PP seems more concerned to discuss what should be the very essence of the game to speak of the earth.
Aznar That does not mean you do not have a point, anyway. With the economy in recession and the government making it unclear messages (note to Moncloa: if you want to increase the budget dependency law , call "fiscal stimulus." One, that is. Two, and you seem competent ), the PP should not have problems too serious to gain ground in the polls clearly able to explain if remotely good. I really do not need to be a plan too "serious" in the sense of detail, in fact, not necessary or even that is too conservative. All you have to do is talk about the economy hard, consistently, and with a consistent message.
And this is probably where Aznar is wrong; I'm not sure that any message worth. Getting to repeat the mantras that neo classical (less taxes, more market, traditional values) is to deliver a coherent message, but I think it is too solid. In a world where the GOP has the planet's economy headlong repeating these mantras so insistent, walk through Spain saying that we must return to that is not exactly a good idea. It is true that it is necessary to liberalize and reform some crucial sectors of the English economy (starting with the universities) and simplify others (justice), but I do not think voters are to these nuances, the PP have to change their rhetoric if you want to go far.
The English right has a unique opportunity to redefine the speech. What is questionable is that you can redefine a message appealing to everyone is delegitimized hard. Would do well to look at Cameron and the British Conservatives to see how one can remain conservative, but with a language and topics appropriate to this century.
0 comments:
Post a Comment